Peter Hegedus
Top Tickers
where they are most provenCall volume & accuracy / 4 months
height = calls / color = accuracyWhere they are a proven trader
ProFrequently asked questions
Is @plhstock accurate?
@plhstock's hit rate on SignalSnitch is 69%: 86 hits against 39 stops. A hit means the price reached the target before the stop inside 7 days; calls that reached neither are left out. That ranks #8 of all tracked traders. Backward-looking record, not financial advice.
What is @plhstock's win rate?
@plhstock has 86 hits and 39 stops across 125 decided calls, putting their hit rate at 69%. The figure is read off real price history, not self-reported results. Hit + Stop does not add up to Calls: one idea counts once a day, calls under 7 days old are still pending, and calls that reached neither barrier are left out.
Which stocks is @plhstock best at?
@plhstock's most-tracked tickers include $NOW, $ZETA, $NVO. Their strongest is $NOW: 86% hit rate. Each ticker sets its own target from how much it usually moves, so a hit on a steady name is a smaller move than on a volatile one. Per-ticker figures are rebuilt daily as calls resolve.
How is @plhstock's accuracy calculated?
How often a call hit its target before its stop, inside 7 days. The target scales with each ticker's volatility — +5% before −8% on most names, tighter on steady ones — so this record spans a few. SignalSnitch reads @plhstock's public X posts, pulls out each call, and follows the price from there. The figure is hits divided by decided calls, and the method is published in full.
Should I follow @plhstock?
SignalSnitch doesn't make follow, buy, or sell recommendations. We publish the receipts — @plhstock's hit rate is 69% across 125 decided calls, ranked #8 overall — so you can judge for yourself. This is accountability data, not financial advice.