Investing visuals
Top Tickers
where they are most provenCall volume & accuracy / 7 months
height = calls / color = accuracyWhere they are a proven trader
ProFrequently asked questions
Is @investingvisual accurate?
@investingvisual's hit rate on SignalSnitch is 64%: 226 hits against 126 stops. A hit means the price reached the target before the stop inside 7 days; calls that reached neither are left out. That ranks #74 of all tracked traders. Backward-looking record, not financial advice.
What is @investingvisual's win rate?
@investingvisual has 226 hits and 126 stops across 352 decided calls, putting their hit rate at 64%. The figure is read off real price history, not self-reported results. Hit + Stop does not add up to Calls: one idea counts once a day, calls under 7 days old are still pending, and calls that reached neither barrier are left out.
Which stocks is @investingvisual best at?
@investingvisual's most-tracked tickers include $CEPL, $SNDK, $SKHY. Their strongest is $CEPL: 100% hit rate. Each ticker sets its own target from how much it usually moves, so a hit on a steady name is a smaller move than on a volatile one. Per-ticker figures are rebuilt daily as calls resolve.
How is @investingvisual's accuracy calculated?
How often a call hit its target before its stop, inside 7 days. The target scales with each ticker's volatility — +5% before −8% on most names, tighter on steady ones — so this record spans a few. SignalSnitch reads @investingvisual's public X posts, pulls out each call, and follows the price from there. The figure is hits divided by decided calls, and the method is published in full.
Should I follow @investingvisual?
SignalSnitch doesn't make follow, buy, or sell recommendations. We publish the receipts — @investingvisual's hit rate is 64% across 352 decided calls, ranked #74 overall — so you can judge for yourself. This is accountability data, not financial advice.