All diagnostics

Fisher's Sales Multiple

EliteCheapest price-to-sales vs sector peers

Price-to-sales only means something next to a company's peers. This ranks each name by how far below its own sector's median P/S it trades, cheapest-vs-sector first. Financials, insurers and REITs report revenue in ways that make raw P/S noisy. Sector-relative ranking cushions this because each name is judged only against its own kind. Not investment advice.

How it works

Ken Fisher's observation in Super Stocks was that earnings are easy to distort and revenue is hard to fake. A company can lose money for a year without becoming a different business. What it sells is the steadier number.

Price-to-sales only means something against peers, because a software company and a grocer will never trade on the same multiple. This screen ranks each name against the median of its own sector, so the question is not whether it is cheap but whether it is cheap for what it is.

P/S = market cap ÷ trailing revenue, ranked against the sector median

When it misleads

A low multiple on sales says nothing about whether those sales make money. Revenue at a two percent margin and revenue at forty get identical treatment here.

Sectors with only a handful of listed names give an unstable median, so those companies sink to the bottom of the list rather than being scored against too few peers.

Today’s ranking — 101 to 150, in full
run 2026-09-18647 ranked of 647
#TickerSectorP/SSector median% vs peersBand
101SWConsumer Cyclical0.751.93+61.4%Undervalued
102HCAHealthcare1.233.17+61.2%Undervalued
103CAGConsumer Defensive0.641.65+61.2%Undervalued
104CPBConsumer Defensive0.641.65+61.2%Undervalued
105NOKTechnology2.957.59+61.2%Undervalued
106TAPConsumer Defensive0.641.65+61.1%Undervalued
107EIXUtilities1.092.80+61.0%Undervalued
108IPConsumer Cyclical0.761.93+60.8%Undervalued
109FNTechnology2.997.59+60.7%Undervalued
110PGRFinancial Services1.373.46+60.4%Undervalued
111GRABTechnology3.047.59+60.0%Undervalued
112TGTConsumer Defensive0.671.65+59.5%Undervalued
113PCGUtilities1.142.80+59.5%Undervalued
114TELTechnology3.087.59+59.4%Undervalued
115VTRSHealthcare1.323.17+58.4%Undervalued
116IBMTechnology3.167.59+58.3%Undervalued
117LMTIndustrials1.603.84+58.3%Undervalued
118AMCRConsumer Cyclical0.821.93+57.4%Undervalued
119AIGFinancial Services1.483.46+57.3%Undervalued
120BAIndustrials1.653.84+57.0%Undervalued
121GEHCHealthcare1.373.17+56.8%Undervalued
122SWKSTechnology3.357.59+55.9%Undervalued
123STMTechnology3.367.59+55.7%Undervalued
124HONIndustrials1.713.84+55.5%Undervalued
125JBHTIndustrials1.743.84+54.7%Undervalued
126NOCIndustrials1.743.84+54.7%Undervalued
127EMEIndustrials1.743.84+54.7%Undervalued
128PFGFinancial Services1.573.46+54.7%Undervalued
129GDIndustrials1.753.84+54.6%Undervalued
130GENTechnology3.457.59+54.6%Undervalued
131MASIndustrials1.753.84+54.5%Undervalued
132OTISIndustrials1.763.84+54.3%Undervalued
133PPGBasic Materials1.413.08+54.3%Undervalued
134AKAMTechnology3.487.59+54.2%Undervalued
135TRVFinancial Services1.593.46+54.0%Undervalued
136ENPHTechnology3.507.59+54.0%Undervalued
137TRMBTechnology3.527.59+53.6%Undervalued
138CSGPReal Estate3.317.04+53.0%Undervalued
139CRHBasic Materials1.483.08+52.1%Undervalued
140AREReal Estate3.437.04+51.3%Undervalued
141GFSTechnology3.717.59+51.1%Undervalued
142ACGLFinancial Services1.703.46+50.9%Undervalued
143INTUTechnology3.807.59+50.0%Undervalued
144WRBFinancial Services1.733.46+49.9%Undervalued
145ADBETechnology3.817.59+49.8%Undervalued
146OMCCommunication Services0.981.94+49.5%Undervalued
147FTVTechnology3.867.59+49.1%Undervalued
148LULUConsumer Cyclical0.991.93+49.0%Undervalued
149BXPReal Estate3.607.04+48.8%Undervalued
150HALEnergy1.272.47+48.8%Undervalued
Ranks 1–100 are members-onlyEverything here is the real thing — same columns, same numbers a member gets. You're standing in the middle of the list; the hundred names this screen ranks highest sit above you.See the full ranking

Screens that ask a similar question